Criminal Deceptions: Italy's COVID vaccine Cover-Up

Criminal Deceptions: Italy's COVID vaccine Cover-Up

Summary

This extensive document compiles Barbara Balanzoni's passionate and critical exposé of Italy's COVID-19 pandemic management, asserting systemic deception and criminal misconduct by government and scientific bodies like the CTS (Technical Scientific Committee) and AIFA (Italian Medicines Agency). As a medical professional and jurist, Balanzoni vehemently disputes the official narrative, alleging that these entities knowingly concealed scientific evidence, suppressed dissenting opinions, and promoted dangerous, ineffective vaccines for political rather than public health reasons. Central to her claims is alleged political pressure on scientific decisions, a stark discrepancy between officials' public statements and private admissions of vaccine risks, and a deliberate cover-up (insabbiamento) of adverse effects and deaths. The source highlights specific instances, such as a recorded CTS meeting where members discussed Astrazeneca's serious risks and efforts to omit this from official minutes, and Balanzoni's ongoing legal reports to the NAS (Anti-Adulteration and Health Units), which she believes have been deliberately ignored by the judiciary, leading to her call for judicial accountability and no leniency for those involved.

Podcast: 

Italian Pandemic Management: A Jurist's Criminal Allegations

Study Guide: Analysis of "Conseguenze penali delle rivelazioni comparse sulla gestione del CTS dei liquami mortali"

This study guide is designed to help you review and understand the provided Italian source material. The text is a passionate and critical exposé by Barbara Balanzoni, an Italian medical professional and jurist, regarding the management of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy, specifically focusing on alleged misconduct by the Technical Scientific Committee (CTS) and various political and medical figures.

I. Key Themes and Arguments

• Critique of Pandemic Management: The central theme is a strong condemnation of how the Italian government and scientific bodies (CTS, AIFA) handled the COVID-19 pandemic, alleging incompetence, political influence, and deliberate deception.

• Vaccine Efficacy and Safety: Balanzoni vehemently disputes the official narrative regarding COVID-19 vaccines, particularly Astrazeneca, arguing they were ineffective at preventing infection, dangerous, and promoted despite known risks. She highlights specific concerns about mRNA technology and its impact on oncological and autoimmune patients.

• Suppression of Dissent and Censorship: A significant part of her argument addresses the alleged censorship and suppression of dissenting medical opinions on social media and traditional media outlets, preventing the public from accessing alternative information.

• Legal Accountability and Insabbiamento (Cover-up): Balanzoni, as a jurist, focuses heavily on the legal ramifications of the alleged misconduct, demanding accountability from political figures, medical professionals, and even the judiciary if her past criminal reports (informative di reato) were ignored or "covered up."

• Political Interference in Scientific Decisions: She repeatedly asserts that scientific decisions were swayed by political pressures, rather than being based on robust scientific evidence, leading to detrimental public health outcomes.

• Discrepancy Between Public and Private Statements: A crucial point of contention is the alleged difference between the public statements of figures like Giorgio Palù and their private admissions within CTS meetings regarding vaccine risks.

• Criminal Negligence and Intent (Dolo di Evento): Balanzoni argues that many involved acted with "dolo di evento" (intent to cause an event), meaning they were aware of the risks of death but proceeded regardless, leading to thousands of preventable deaths.

II. Key Individuals and Organizations

• Barbara Balanzoni: The speaker, a surgeon, anesthesiologist, resuscitator, and jurist, also an army reserve officer. She identifies herself as the primary denouncer of these alleged crimes since 2020.

• Giorgio Palù: Former President of AIFA and a virologist. Initially optimistic about the virus, his stance reportedly changed after his AIFA appointment, promoting vaccination. Balanzoni highlights his alleged differing public and private opinions on vaccine risks.

• Roberto Speranza: Former Minister of Health. Balanzoni identifies him as the "apice governativo" (governmental apex) and "criminale per eccellenza" (criminal par excellence) responsible for political pressures.

• Franco Locatelli: Mentioned as participating in the CTS meeting.

• Francesco Paolo Figliuolo: Mentioned as participating in the CTS meeting.

• Giuseppe Ippolito: Mentioned as participating in the CTS meeting, admitting reluctance to challenge political decisions.

• Giovanni Rezza: Mentioned as participating in the CTS meeting.

• Nicola Magrini: Mentioned as participating in the CTS meeting.

• Sergio Abrignani: University professor, member of the CTS, noted for expressing concern about "putting a tombstone on vaccines" if risks were revealed.

• Caterina Caporale (the Bioethicist): Member of the CTS, noted for suggesting Astrazeneca could only be justified in "emerging countries."

• Sergio Fiorentino (State Lawyer): Member of the CTS, advised omitting parts of the debate from official minutes to avoid legal or image consequences.

• Filippo Anelli: President of Fnomceo (National Federation of Orders of Doctors and Dentists). Accused by Balanzoni of making false statements under oath and pursuing legal action against her.

• NAS (Nuclei Antisofisticazioni e Sanità - Anti-Adulteration and Health Units of the Carabinieri): The Carabinieri's health police. Balanzoni praises the NAS of Rome for diligently following up on her criminal reports, while questioning the judiciary's inaction.

• CTS (Comitato Tecnico Scientifico - Technical Scientific Committee): The primary scientific advisory body during the pandemic. Accused of being politically influenced, aware of vaccine risks, and suppressing information.

• AIFA (Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco - Italian Medicines Agency): The Italian regulatory body for pharmaceuticals. Palù was its president.

• "La Verità" (The Truth): An Italian newspaper cited by Balanzoni as publishing articles that confirm her long-standing allegations.

III. Key Events and Evidence Cited

• "Corona Stampa 5 anni dopo": The rubric under which Balanzoni is speaking, suggesting a review of pandemic events five years later (from 2020).

• August 26, 2025, "La Verità" article: Discusses Palù's political pressures concerning vaccines (Astrazeneca specifically, but Balanzoni broadens it to all).

• Knowledge of Deaths (Spring 2021): Balanzoni asserts that by spring 2021, authorities were "super consapevoli" of vaccine-related deaths and had been serially lying since 2020.

• Hydroxychloroquine Study: Alleged "farsa" (farce) study claiming its ineffectiveness, while Balanzoni claims it was effective.

• "Attendere a casa" (Wait at home) directive: Policy encouraging people to wait until severe respiratory distress before seeking medical help, allegedly to increase deaths.

• Bergamo Images: Used to portray a militarized emergency, justifying the government's actions.

• Deaths of Stefano Paternò and Camilla Cacepa: Cited as early victims of the "liquame velenoso e mortifero" (poisonous and deadly sludge/liquid), linking Paternò's death to an antibody-potentiated illness and Cacepa's to coagulation problems.

• Withdrawal of vaccine by Speranza: Briefly mentioned, followed by a quick resumption of vaccination.

• Balanzoni's Denunciations: She details extensive criminal reports (informative di reato) and sworn statements (sommarie informazioni testimoniali) submitted to the NAS since 2020, with supporting documentation.

• CTS Meeting of June 7, 2021 (and May 7, 2021): A critical piece of evidence. Balanzoni refers to a transcript by the NAS of Genoa (Proc. Penale No. 12914) of an audio/video recording of this meeting. This meeting allegedly revealed detailed discussions among CTS members about the serious risks of Astrazeneca, especially for those under 60, and efforts to conceal these risks from the public and official minutes.

• Palù's "fuorionda" (off-air/open mic) video: A video where Palù allegedly admitted political pressure from the Ministry of Health to approve vaccines for younger age groups, contradicting his public statements.

• Palù's Change of Stance (Dec 2020): After becoming AIFA president, Palù reportedly shifted from skepticism to promoting vaccination, claiming they prevented infection (which Balanzoni argues was never true or tested).

• Palù's Resignation from AIFA (Feb 2024): Due to "divergenze con Schillaci" (differences with Schillaci) over a one-year renewal of his term, not scientific or ethical reasons.

• Schillaci's role: Current Minister of Health, facing scrutiny.

• Dengue Fever Vaccination for Military: Balanzoni notes that military personnel are currently being subjected to a "denghe" vaccine, which she also deems unjustifiable, highlighting a continued pattern of mandatory, potentially harmful vaccinations.

IV. Legal and Ethical Dimensions

• Criminal Reports (Informative di Reato): Balanzoni's own formal accusations of crime.

• Sommarie Informazioni Testimoniali: Sworn witness statements taken by law enforcement.

• Proc. Penale No. 12914, Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Genova: The specific criminal proceeding related to the CTS meeting transcripts.

• "Insabbiamento" (Cover-up): Accusation against the judiciary if they failed to act on her reports.

• Dolo di Evento (Intent to cause an event): The legal concept Balanzoni applies to those who knowingly promoted vaccines despite awareness of potential deaths.

• "Medicina Nazista" (Nazi Medicine): A provocative term Balanzoni uses to describe the alleged project of medical control and deception.

• Censorship: The systematic blocking of dissenting views on social media (Facebook, Instagram, YouTube) and traditional media.

• Abuse of Office/Public Trust: The discrepancy between public and private statements by officials, and the prioritization of political aims over public health.

• Omitting information from official minutes: A deliberate act to conceal evidence of risk.

V. Implications and Calls to Action

• Call for Judicial Action: Balanzoni strongly urges magistrates to act on her denunciations, warning of potential investigations against the judiciary itself for inaction.

• No "Sconti di Pena" (Discounts on Sentences): She insists there should be no leniency for those involved, whether they were "scemi" (stupid/ignorant) or knowingly deceptive.

• Procedibilità d'ufficio: The crimes are so serious that public prosecutors can pursue them ex officio, without a formal complaint from a private citizen.

• Ongoing Deaths and Illnesses: Balanzoni states that vaccine-related deaths, cancers, and worsening degenerative diseases are still occurring and will continue into the future.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quiz: Understanding the "Conseguenze penali delle rivelazioni..." Source Material

Instructions: Answer each question in 2-3 sentences, drawing directly from the provided text.

1. What is Barbara Balanzoni's professional background, and how does it inform her critique?

2. What is the main accusation Balanzoni makes against the management of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy?

3. Who is Giorgio Palù, and what specific allegations does Balanzoni make regarding his public and private statements?

4. According to Balanzoni, what was the primary concern of the CTS members during their secret meeting regarding Astrazeneca, beyond public health?

5. What role did the NAS play in Balanzoni's efforts to expose alleged misconduct?

6. Explain the concept of "dolo di evento" as Balanzoni applies it to those promoting the vaccines.

7. How does Balanzoni characterize the "official sources" of information during the pandemic?

8. What evidence does the text present to support the claim that the CTS knew about the risks of Astrazeneca?

9. Why does Balanzoni criticize Sergio Fiorentino, the State Lawyer, based on his alleged actions during the CTS meeting?

10. What is Balanzoni's call to action regarding the judiciary, and what is her warning to them?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Answer Key

1. Barbara Balanzoni is a medical surgeon, anesthesiologist, resuscitator, and jurist, as well as an army reserve officer. This multi-faceted background allows her to critique the pandemic management from both a specialized medical perspective and a legal standpoint, emphasizing the criminal implications of the alleged actions.

2. Balanzoni accuses the Italian government and scientific bodies of serial lying, political interference in scientific decisions, deliberately concealing evidence of vaccine dangers and deaths, and promoting ineffective and harmful vaccinations for political reasons, rather than public health.

3. Giorgio Palù is the former President of AIFA. Balanzoni alleges that he made public statements promoting vaccines and denying risks, while privately admitting in a "fuorionda" video and CTS meetings that he felt political pressure to approve vaccines for younger age groups, creating a discrepancy between his public and private positions.

4. According to Balanzoni, the primary concern of the CTS members during their secret meeting was to maintain the "riservatezza delle informazioni più delicate" and avoid including "dati che avrebbero potuto suonare come una missione di rischio elevato" in official minutes, essentially to protect the vaccine's image, not public health.

5. The NAS (Carabinieri's Anti-Adulteration and Health Units) played a crucial role as the recipient of Balanzoni's extensive criminal reports and sworn witness statements. She commends the NAS of Rome for being "molto solerte" (very diligent) in following up on her reports, even sending officers to her location.

6. Balanzoni applies the concept of "dolo di evento" to those who promoted the vaccines, arguing they accepted the risk that people would die. This means they were fully aware of the potential for deaths (the "evento") but proceeded with their actions regardless, classifying their conduct as criminally intentional.

7. Balanzoni characterizes the "official sources" of information during the pandemic as coinciding with "pezzi di merda" and "criminali della medicina nazista." She asserts that these sources actively participated in a system of censorship and disinformation, preventing the public from accessing truth and promoting dangerous narratives.

8. The text presents the NAS of Genoa's transcription of an audio/video recording of a CTS meeting from June 7, 2021 (or May 7, 2021) as evidence. This transcription allegedly reveals detailed discussions among experts about the severe risks of Astrazeneca, especially for those under 60, and their efforts to conceal this information.

9. Balanzoni criticizes Sergio Fiorentino, the State Lawyer, for expressing concerns about the potential diffusion of sensitive information from the CTS meeting. He allegedly suggested omitting parts of the debate from the official minutes to avoid legal consequences or damage to their image, an action Balanzoni views as a profound professional failing.

10. Balanzoni's call to action for the judiciary is to "muovere le chiappe" (get moving) and act on her past criminal reports. She warns them that if they do not act spontaneously, they will be compelled to do so in a "meno spontaneo" manner, and might even face investigations themselves for alleged "insabbiamento" (cover-up) of her denunciations.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Essay Questions (No Answers Supplied)

1. Analyze the role of political influence versus scientific evidence in the decision-making processes of the CTS and AIFA, according to Barbara Balanzoni's account. Discuss specific examples and their alleged consequences.

2. Discuss Balanzoni's accusations of censorship and suppression of information during the pandemic. How does she claim these actions impacted public understanding and the ability to make informed health choices?

3. Examine the legal arguments and accusations Balanzoni levels against the various actors involved in pandemic management (politicians, medical professionals, CTS members, and potentially the judiciary). What specific legal concepts does she invoke, and how does she justify their application?

4. Compare and contrast the alleged public statements and private positions of Giorgio Palù as described by Balanzoni. What is the significance of this discrepancy, and what ethical and legal implications does it carry?

5. Evaluate Barbara Balanzoni's effectiveness as a critic and whistleblower, considering her professional background, the evidence she cites, and her passionate tone. What are the strengths and potential weaknesses of her approach in presenting her case?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Glossary of Key Terms

• AIFA (Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco): The Italian Medicines Agency, the national regulatory body responsible for drug evaluation, authorization, and surveillance.

• Astrazeneca: A brand of COVID-19 vaccine, heavily scrutinized in the text for alleged severe side effects, particularly thrombosis.

• Comitato Tecnico Scientifico (CTS): The Technical Scientific Committee, an advisory body in Italy that provided scientific and technical advice to the government during the COVID-19 pandemic.

• Corona Stampa 5 anni dopo: "Press Review 5 Years Later," the title of the rubric or series under which Barbara Balanzoni is speaking, indicating a retrospective analysis of pandemic events.

• Dolo di Evento: (Legal term, "intent to cause an event"). In Italian criminal law, this refers to a form of intent where a person foresees the possibility of a harmful event resulting from their actions and accepts that risk, proceeding nonetheless. Balanzoni applies it to those who knowingly risked deaths.

• Fascicolo: (Legal term) A file or dossier, containing documents related to a specific case or investigation.

• Fnomceo (Federazione Nazionale degli Ordini dei Medici Chirurghi e degli Odontoiatri): The National Federation of Orders of Doctors and Dentists, the professional body for medical practitioners in Italy.

• Fuorionda: (Literally "off-air") Refers to statements or actions caught on camera or microphone when a broadcast is not live, or when a person believes they are not being recorded or heard.

• Informativa di Reato: (Legal term) A formal criminal report or notification of a crime filed with law enforcement or judicial authorities.

• Insabbiamento: (Figurative) A cover-up or whitewash; the act of concealing or suppressing information, especially related to wrongdoing or crime.

• La Verità: "The Truth," an Italian newspaper cited in the text as publishing articles supporting Balanzoni's allegations.

• Liquame mortale/velenoso: "Deadly/poisonous sludge/liquid," a pejorative term used by Balanzoni to refer to the COVID-19 vaccines, highlighting her belief in their harmful nature.

• Medicina Nazista: "Nazi Medicine," a highly provocative and critical term used by Balanzoni to describe the alleged project of medical control, deception, and disregard for human life during the pandemic.

• mRNA (messenger RNA): Messenger ribonucleic acid, a type of genetic material used in some COVID-19 vaccines (e.g., Pfizer, Moderna), which Balanzoni identifies as "super pericoloso."

• NAS (Nuclei Antisofisticazioni e Sanità): The Anti-Adulteration and Health Units, a specialized branch of the Carabinieri (Italian military police) responsible for investigating crimes related to health, food safety, and pharmaceuticals.

• Procedibilità d'ufficio: (Legal term) Refers to crimes that can be prosecuted ex officio by public prosecutors, meaning they can initiate proceedings without a formal complaint from a private citizen, usually because the crime is considered serious and affects the public interest.

• Procura della Repubblica: The Public Prosecutor's Office in Italy, responsible for conducting criminal investigations and prosecutions.

• RSA (Residenze Sanitarie Assistenziali): Assisted Residential Facilities, often nursing homes or long-term care facilities for the elderly.

• Schillaci: Orazio Schillaci, the current Minister of Health in Italy, mentioned in the context of Palù's resignation and current political scrutiny.

• Sommarie informazioni testimoniali: (Legal term) Summary witness statements, often taken by law enforcement in the early stages of an investigation.

• Speranza, Roberto: Former Minister of Health in Italy during the COVID-19 pandemic, identified by Balanzoni as a key figure responsible for political pressures and alleged misconduct.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Italy's COVID Cover-Up: Balanzoni's Accusations and Criminal Consequences

Briefing Document: "Criminal Consequences of Revelations Regarding the CTS Management of Deadly Waste"

Source: Excerpts from "Conseguenze penali delle rivelazioni comparse sulla gestione del CTS dei liquami mortali" (Criminal Consequences of Revelations Regarding the CTS Management of Deadly Waste) - A video statement by Barbara Balanzoni.

Date of Source: Appears to be a summary of an article published on La Verità on August 26, 2025, but the video itself is an analysis presented by Barbara Balanzoni.

Author/Speaker: Barbara Balanzoni (Doctor, surgeon, anesthesiologist, reanimator, lawyer, reserve army officer).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Executive Summary

This briefing document summarizes a detailed exposé by Barbara Balanzoni concerning alleged systemic deceit, political pressure, and potential criminal misconduct by various Italian authorities, medical professionals, and governmental bodies (particularly the CTS - Comitato Tecnico Scientifico) during the COVID-19 pandemic. The core accusation is that these entities knowingly concealed scientific evidence, lied to the public, and promoted dangerous vaccines for political and economic reasons, leading to widespread illness and death. Balanzoni highlights specific instances of alleged cover-ups, inconsistencies in public statements versus internal discussions, and a pervasive culture of prioritizing political expediency over public health. She also details her own long-standing efforts to report these alleged crimes to the authorities (NAS) and her intent to pursue legal action against any magistrates who may have suppressed her complaints.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Key Themes and Most Important Ideas/Facts

A. Allegations of a "Nazi Medicine Project" and Serial Deception:

• Systematic Lying and Concealment (2020 onwards): Balanzoni asserts that from 2020, there was a continuous and serial pattern of lying to the public and concealing evidence.

    ◦ "dal 2020 avevano continuato a mentire in modo seriale per far sì che venissero occultate tutte le evidenze le prove" (from 2020 they had continued to lie serially to ensure that all evidence and proof were concealed).

• Fabricated Studies and Misinformation:

    ◦ A "farcical" study on the ineffectiveness of hydroxychloroquine, which Balanzoni claims was "perfect" and effective.

    ◦ Propaganda to encourage people to wait at home until they had severe breathing difficulties before seeking an ambulance, allegedly to increase death tolls and claim "no cure exists" despite an existing and effective cure.

    ◦ Images of Bergamo used for "militarization of society" to show an "emergency that also required the armed forces."

• "Poisonous and Deadly Sludge" (Vaccines): Balanzoni repeatedly refers to the vaccines as "liquame velenoso e mortifero" (poisonous and deadly sludge/effluent) and "merde" (shits).

    ◦ Early deaths linked to vaccination, including Stefano Paternò and Camila Cacepa, allegedly due to "disease potentiated by the antibody" and "coagulative system problems."

• Awareness of Dangers by Spring 2021:

    ◦ "dal 21 quindi dalla primavera del 21 erano già tutti super consapevoli della della pericolosità non non scusate ho detto una parola sbagliata non della pericolosità teorica ma del fatto che ci fossero dei morti e non sapevano come uscirne" (from '21, so from spring of '21, they were all super aware of the danger – no, sorry, I said the wrong word, not theoretical danger, but the fact that there were deaths, and they didn't know how to get out of it).

B. Political Pressure and Undermining of Scientific Integrity:

• Giorgio Palù's Confession: Giorgio Palù, former AIFA president, is central to these claims. An article in La Verità (August 26, 2025) discusses "political pressures that influenced scientific decisions on vaccines, particularly AstraZeneca."

    ◦ Palù reportedly admitted in an "unofficial interview" (or a hot mic incident during a CTS meeting) to "avere ricevuto pressione dal Ministero della Salute per approvare la somministrazione di vaccini a fasce di età più basse" (having received pressure from the Ministry of Health to approve the administration of vaccines to lower age groups).

• Discrepancy Between Public and Private Statements: Palù's public declarations were allegedly contradicted by his private opinions and discussions within the CTS.

    ◦ "la discrepanza tra le esternazioni pubbliche di Palù e le sue posizioni all'interno del CTS" (the discrepancy between Palù's public statements and his positions within the CTS).

• Decisions Guided by Politics, Not Science:

    ◦ "si contesta che le decisioni governative durante la pandemia non siano state guidate dalla scienza assolutamente no ve l'ho detto per anni ma influenzate da motivazioni politiche aggiungo io perverse e demoniache" (it is contested that government decisions during the pandemic were not guided by science, absolutely not, I've told you for years, but influenced by political motivations, I add, perverse and demonic).

• Abdicating Technical Role: The CTS members were allegedly more concerned with not irritating political authorities than applying scientific methods or protecting public health.

    ◦ "i membri del CTS fossero più dediti a non irritare le autorità politiche che ad applicarle rigorosamente il metodo scientifico che non c'è mai stato aggiungo io e a prendere decisioni a tutela della salute pubblica" (the CTS members were more dedicated to not irritating political authorities than to rigorously applying the scientific method, which never existed, I add, and to making decisions to protect public health).

C. Concerns Regarding Vaccine Efficacy and Safety (AstraZeneca, mRNA):

• Vaccines Never Prevented Infection: Balanzoni states that vaccines "non hanno mai never mai prevenuto l'infezione" (have never, never, ever prevented infection), a fact she claims was known even by manufacturers. She suggests vaccination might even "slatentizzasse" (unmask/reactivate) other viruses, leading to conditions like herpes zoster.

• mRNA Technology Deemed "Super Dangerous": Balanzoni asserts that mRNA technology was "super pericoloso e anzi metteva a grossissimo rischio i malati oncologici cioè tutti ma in particolare i malati oncologici e i malati autoimmuni" (super dangerous and indeed put cancer patients – everyone, but especially cancer patients and autoimmune patients – at very high risk).

• AstraZeneca as a "Sacrifice": Balanzoni views AstraZeneca as a "specchietto per le allodole" (decoy/red herring) or a "sacrifice" to allow Pfizer and Moderna to "ammazzare le persone" (kill people). She urges not to focus solely on AstraZeneca but to use its case as a model for understanding the behavior of CTS members regarding all vaccines.

• Known Risks of AstraZeneca: A "secret" CTS meeting on May 7, 2021, reportedly discussed "rischi gravi legati all'AstraZeneca specialmente sotto i 60 anni" (serious risks associated with AstraZeneca, especially under 60).

    ◦ The expert report showed a 1:1 ratio of lives saved to severe thromboses for the 50-59 age group, which Balanzoni interprets as an "arma biologica" (biological weapon). In high circulation, this ratio could be 1:15, deemed "not sustainable from a human point of view."

    ◦ 34 confirmed victims of venous thrombosis (29 intracranial, 5 visceral) were reported at that time, with an average age of 48 for women and 52 for men.

• Cover-Up of Risks: There was a "forte sforzo di mantenere la riservatezza delle informazioni più delicate" (strong effort to maintain the confidentiality of the most delicate information) and "non includere nei verbali ufficiali i dati che avrebbero potuto suonare come una missione di rischio elevato per Astrazeneca" (not to include in official minutes data that could sound like an admission of high risk for AstraZeneca).

    ◦ Sergio Fiorentino, a state lawyer, allegedly suggested "omettere parti di dibattito nei verbali per evitare conseguenze legali o di immagini" (omitting parts of the debate in the minutes to avoid legal or image consequences).

• "Bioethicist" Caporale's Statement: A "bioethicist" named Caporale allegedly stated that AstraZeneca "può essere giustificato solo in paesi emergenti" (can only be justified in emerging countries), implying that the lives of people in those countries were less valued.

• "Saving the Vaccine, Not the People": The primary concern was "salvare il vaccino non le persone per evitare che sembrasse un vaccino di serie B" (saving the vaccine, not the people, to prevent it from seeming like a second-class vaccine).

• Unstudied Heterologous Vaccination: The decision to use mRNA vaccines as a second dose after AstraZeneca was "beatamente inventata" (blissfully invented) without prior study, according to Balanzoni.

D. Role of Key Figures and Institutions:

• Roberto Speranza: Described as "il criminale per eccellenza quella pedina quel quel totalmente inetto" (the criminal par excellence, that pawn, that totally inept individual), and "l'apice governativo" (the governmental apex). Balanzoni holds him criminally responsible regardless of who gave him instructions.

• Franco Locatelli, Speranza, Figliuolo, Palù, Ippolito, Greco, Ciciliano, Nicola Magrini: These individuals (and others like Arignani, Melegaro, Caporale, Brusaferro, Rezza, Fiorentino) were present at the CTS meeting discussing AstraZeneca risks.

• Filippo Anelli (President of Fnomceo): Allegedly stated under oath that the pandemic was ending in early 2022, yet doctors were suspended, and that vaccines prevented infection and worked because doctors stopped dying. Balanzoni claims he stated, "Io eseguivo gli ordeni" (I followed orders).

• NAS (Nucleo Antisofisticazioni e Sanità dei Carabinieri): Balanzoni extensively details her multiple criminal complaints (informative di reato) and sworn testimonies (sommarie informazioni testimoniali) to the NAS, particularly NAS Rome, since 2020. She praises NAS Rome's diligence and cooperation, stating they always followed up.

    ◦ "il NAS di Roma quindi comando generale del NAS è sempre stato molto solerte al punto al punto da facilitarmi le cose delegando un nucleo territoriale del NAS per venire ad Alba mensilmente o bimensilmente per prendersi le sommarie informazioni testimoniali" (the NAS of Rome, the general command of the NAS, has always been very diligent to the point of facilitating things for me by delegating a territorial unit of the NAS to come to Alba monthly or bimonthly to take my sworn testimonies).

• Magistracy (Prosecutor's Office): Balanzoni questions why, despite her detailed complaints and the audio/video evidence now revealed, these individuals are not being prosecuted. She warns of potential legal consequences for magistrates who may have "insabbiato" (covered up) her reports.

    ◦ "ci saranno anche conseguenze giuridiche nei confronti della magistratura se la magistratura non ha dato seguito" (there will also be legal consequences for the magistracy if the magistracy has not followed up).

    ◦ "non è accettabile che si vengano a scoprire nell'agosto 2025 cose che erano state denunciate proprio a Pertis Verbis nel man mano che le cose accadevano dal 2020" (it is not acceptable that things discovered in August 2025 were denounced verbatim as they happened since 2020).

E. Calls for Accountability and Legal Action:

• Criminal Responsibility: Balanzoni emphasizes the "profondissima responsabilità penale" (very deep criminal responsibility) of those who made contradictory statements or concealed information.

• "Dolo di Evento" (Intent to Cause Harm/Death): She argues that those who knew the risks but promoted vaccination, accepting the risk of people dying, acted with "dolo di evento," which carries severe criminal implications.

• Incapacity vs. Conscious Deceit: She distinguishes between those "completamente scemi" (completely stupid) who might receive security measures (mental health detention) and those "maledette merde che consapevoli di quell cioè del fatto di mentire tranquillamente mentivano" (damned shits who, aware of the facts, calmly lied) due to political pressure, who deserve no leniency.

• Demand for Prosecutions: Balanzoni repeatedly asks, "perché non sono scattati gli i fermi di queste persone perché non sono convocati in procura" (why have these people not been arrested, why are they not summoned to the prosecutor's office?).

• Personal Commitment and Warning: Balanzoni asserts her own integrity, having made these denunciations since 2021 despite personal detriment (e.g., being disbarred). She vows to scrutinize the handling of her past reports and warns magistrates of potential investigation if they fail to act.

    ◦ "la dignità non ha un prezzo" (dignity has no price).

    ◦ "invito i magistrati a muovere le chiappe perché io andrò a fare una verifica su tutto ciò che avevo già segnalato allora voglio capire che giri ha fatto e non ci saranno sconti per nessuno" (I invite the magistrates to get off their butts because I will go and verify everything I had already reported, so I want to understand what happened, and there will be no discounts for anyone).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Implications and Future Considerations

• Potential for High-Profile Legal Cases: The revelations, particularly the alleged audio/video evidence from CTS meetings and Palù's purported admission of political pressure, could trigger significant criminal investigations targeting former government officials and scientific advisors.

• Scrutiny of the Italian Judiciary: Balanzoni's explicit warnings to magistrates suggest potential investigations into judicial handling of her initial complaints, raising questions about potential cover-ups within the legal system itself.

• Public Trust in Institutions: The detailed accusations of systemic deception and political interference could further erode public trust in scientific bodies, governmental health authorities, and the media.

• Re-evaluation of Pandemic Management: If these claims are substantiated, there could be a widespread re-evaluation of Italy's COVID-19 pandemic management, potentially leading to policy changes and accountability measures.

• Impact on Vaccine Policy: The claims regarding vaccine safety and efficacy, particularly concerning the lack of infection prevention and specific risks to oncological/autoimmune patients, could reignite debates on vaccine mandates and public health strategies.

• Wider Scope of Alleged Misconduct: The mention of other ongoing health issues (monkeypox, West Nile, Dengue, etc.) and the "vaccine discipline" for military personnel suggests Balanzoni sees a broader pattern of problematic health policy beyond COVID-19.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Italy's COVID Cover-Up: A Chronicle of Deception

Here's a detailed timeline of the main events and a cast of characters based on the provided source:

Timeline of Main Events

Early 2020:

• Initial Optimism and Opposition to Lockdowns: Giorgio Palù expresses optimism about the virus's evolution and opposes new lockdowns, claiming 95% of infected individuals are asymptomatic and that "zero contagion" via molecular swabs is irrational.

Throughout 2020 - Spring 2021:

• Systematic Deception and Cover-up: According to Barbara Balanzoni, authorities continuously lied to conceal evidence and facts regarding the pandemic.

• Suppression of Hydroxychloroquine: A "fake study" is used to dismiss hydroxychloroquine, which Balanzoni claims was effective.

• "Wait at Home" Policy: People are advised to wait at home until severe breathing difficulties arise, allegedly to increase death tolls and support the claim that "no cure exists."

• Militarization of Society: Images from Bergamo are used to portray an emergency requiring military intervention.

• Early Deaths Linked to "Poisonous Sludge" (Vaccine): Stefano Paternò (military) and Camilla Cacepa (Genova) are among the first victims, with Paternò's death linked to an antibody-potentiated illness in Sicily and Cacepa's to a coagulative system issue. These deaths are promptly reported by Balanzoni.

• Roberto Speranza's Actions: Speranza reportedly states he will withdraw the vaccine for a week after Paternò's death, but then announces vaccination will resume the next day.

• Barbara Balanzoni's Denunciations: Balanzoni begins submitting detailed reports ("informative di reato" and "sommarie informazioni testimoniali") to the NAS (specifically NAS of Rome) and publicly on social media, continuously from 2020, asserting the impossibility of an effective vaccine due to the inherent dangers of mRNA technology, particularly for oncological and autoimmune patients.

• Censorship of Alternative Information: Social media platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Instagram) block Balanzoni's content and display banners supporting WHO guidelines, removing videos that contradict official narratives.

December 2020:

• Palù Becomes AIFA President: Giorgio Palù is appointed President of AIFA (Italian Medicines Agency).

• Palù's Shift in Stance: After becoming AIFA president, Palù changes his public stance, promoting COVID-19 vaccination and claiming vaccines prevent infection.

May 7, 2021:

• Secret CTS Meeting (Video/Audio Recording): A confidential videoconference of the CTS (Technical Scientific Committee) takes place. Attendees include Franco Locatelli, Roberto Speranza, Francesco Paolo Figliuolo, Giorgio Palù, Giuseppe Ippolito, Giovanni Rezza, Claudio Ciciliano, Nicola Magrini, Sergio Abrignani, Patrizia Caporale, Silvio Brusaferro, and Sergio Fiorentino.

• Discussion of AstraZeneca Risks: Experts extensively discuss serious risks associated with AstraZeneca, especially for those under 60. The ratio of lives saved to severe thromboses is reported as 1:1, reaching 1:15 in high viral circulation scenarios, and considered unsustainable.

• Evidence of Adverse Events: At this time, 34 cases of vaccine-associated venous thrombosis (29 intracranial, 5 visceral) are reported in Italy, resulting in 34 deaths (22 women, avg. age 48; 12 men, avg. age 52).

• Concerns about Public Perception: Some members, like Sergio Abrignani, express concern that acknowledging risks would "put a tombstone on vaccines."

• Proposal for Heterologous Vaccination: A solution involving a second dose with mRNA vaccines (Pfizer/Moderna) after AstraZeneca is suggested, despite no studies on its efficacy or safety.

• Palù's Dissent (Internal): Giorgio Palù expresses clear disagreement with administering AstraZeneca to those over 50-59 years old, or doing so with great difficulty due to perceived risk. However, no one takes responsibility to halt or limit AstraZeneca.

• Efforts to Maintain Secrecy: A strong effort is made to keep delicate information confidential and to exclude data from official minutes that would suggest a high risk for AstraZeneca, aiming to "save the vaccine" rather than protect people.

• Bioethicist's Statement: Cinzia Caporale (bioethicist) suggests AstraZeneca can only be justified in "emerging countries," not Italy.

• State Lawyer's Advice: Sergio Fiorentino (State Lawyer) expresses concern about information diffusion and suggests omitting parts of the debate from minutes to avoid legal or image consequences.

• CTS Abdication of Role: Giuseppe Ippolito admits that intervening on already approved documents (e.g., RSA guidelines) would make the CTS appear like a "priest disturbing" politicians, indicating a focus on not irritating authorities rather than scientific rigor.

June 7, 2021:

• Verbal Transcriptions: A verbal report from the CTS meeting of this date (or a subsequent date) is transcribed by Lt. Col. Daniele Quattrocchi of NAS Genova, under order from PM Stefano Puppo and PM Francesca Rombolà. This transcription is acquired in criminal proceedings (no. 12914) by the Genoa Public Prosecutor's Office.

December 2021:

• Palù Recommends Vaccination for Children: Palù recommends COVID-19 vaccination for children and adolescents, claiming COVID had become a "pediatric disease," a claim later disputed by data.

• Continuing Deception: The source alleges that the previous private discussions about vaccine risks occurred before Palù made these public recommendations for children.

Early 2022:

• Filippo Anelli's Statement: Filippo Anelli (President of Fnomceo) states in court to Judge Fabio Cosentino in Bologna that the pandemic was ending in early 2022, yet doctors were being suspended. He also claims vaccines prevented infection and worked because doctors stopped dying after vaccination. He states he was "following orders" and refers inquiries to the WHO or others.

May 2022:

• Barbara Balanzoni's Expulsion from the Medical Order: Balanzoni is expelled from the medical order due to her public statements and denunciations.

February 2024:

• Palù Resigns from AIFA: Giorgio Palù resigns as AIFA president, citing "divergences" with Minister Schillaci and finding the one-year renewal of his mandate "offensive and humiliating." His resignation is not attributed to scientific or ethical reasons but to professional grievances.

August 23/26, 2025 (Future Event at Time of Narration):

• "La Verità" Article Published: An article in "La Verità" is published discussing the management of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy, focusing on Giorgio Palù and political pressures on vaccine decisions (specifically AstraZeneca). The article highlights discrepancies between Palù's public statements and his private opinions.

• Revelations of Deception: The article and the speaker reveal that by spring 2021, authorities were fully aware of deaths linked to the vaccines but continued lying since 2020.

• Video Publication and Palù's Admission: A video is published (or comes to light) where Palù, in an "off-camera" moment (with an open mic), admits to receiving pressure from the Ministry of Health to approve vaccine administration for younger age groups (under 60). This is considered a "very serious episode."

• Palù Summoned by Covid Commission: Palù is called to appear before the Covid Commission at the request of Fratelli d'Italia following the video's publication.

• Meloni-Schillaci Confrontation: Minister Schillaci is scheduled to have a direct confrontation with Giorgia Meloni on August 28th regarding these issues.

Ongoing (Post-Pandemic, up to 2025):

• Continued Deaths and Illnesses: The speaker claims that deaths, rapid cancers, and worsening degenerative diseases continue as a result of the "poisonous sludge."

• Monkeypox, West Nile, Chikungunya, Dengue: Other health crises, including monkeypox (with associated vaccinations), West Nile, Chikungunya, and dengue fever (affecting military personnel, who are still subjected to mandatory dengue vaccination), are mentioned.

• Military Anger: Military personnel are reportedly "furious" over mandatory vaccinations, particularly for dengue, and remember being forced to take COVID-19 vaccines.

• Demand for Judicial Action: Barbara Balanzoni calls on magistrates to act on her extensive complaints, warning of potential judicial cover-ups if her "informative di reato" are not pursued.

Cast of Characters

Principle Accuser/Narrator:

• Barbara Balanzoni: A surgeon, anesthesiologist, resuscitator, and law graduate, also an officer in the selected reserve army. She is the primary source of information and accusations in the text, claiming to have continuously denounced the alleged deceptions and dangers of the COVID-19 response and vaccines since 2020. She was expelled from the medical order in May 2022.

Key Government and Medical Officials (Accused/Implicated):

• Giorgio Palù: Former President of AIFA (Italian Medicines Agency) and a virologist. Initially optimistic and against lockdowns, he later became a prominent advocate for vaccination after his appointment to AIFA in December 2020. He is accused of publicly stating that vaccines prevent infection, despite internal knowledge to the contrary, and of succumbing to political pressure to approve vaccines for younger age groups. He resigned from AIFA in February 2024 citing disagreements with Minister Schillaci.

• Roberto Speranza: Former Minister of Health. Described as "the criminal par excellence" and "totally inept," he is held responsible as the governmental apex for allegedly ignoring warnings and pushing vaccination policies that led to deaths. He is implicated in the decision-making process within the CTS.

• Francesco Paolo Figliuolo: General, involved in the CTS meetings.

• Giuseppe Ippolito: Member of the CTS, who admitted that intervening on approved documents would make the CTS appear like a "priest disturbing" politicians, suggesting a prioritization of political harmony over scientific rigor.

• Filippo Anelli: President of Fnomceo (National Federation of Orders of Doctors and Dentists). Accused of testifying under oath that the pandemic was ending in early 2022, yet doctors were suspended, and that vaccines prevented infection and saved lives, while also claiming he was "following orders." He reportedly sued Balanzoni for significant damages.

• Orazio Schillaci: Minister of Health (current at the time of the narration, succeeding Speranza). Palù cited "divergences" with Schillaci as his reason for resigning from AIFA. Schillaci is mentioned in the context of a planned confrontation with Giorgia Meloni regarding the revelations.

• Patrizia Caporale: Bioethicist, member of the CTS. She is noted for suggesting that AstraZeneca could only be justified in "emerging countries."

• Sergio Fiorentino: State Lawyer, member of the CTS. He expressed concerns about the diffusion of sensitive information and suggested omitting parts of the debate from official minutes to avoid legal or image consequences.

• Sergio Abrignani: University Professor and member of the CTS. He highlighted the need for alternative, safer vaccines but also worried about public perception if vaccine risks were disclosed, stating it would "put a tombstone on vaccines."

• Franco Locatelli: Member of the CTS.

• Giovanni Rezza: Member of the CTS.

• Claudio Ciciliano: Member of the CTS.

• Nicola Magrini: Member of the CTS.

• Arignani: Member of the CTS (likely a mispronunciation or error, possibly referring to Abrignani again).

• Melegaro: Member of the CTS.

• Brusaferro: Member of the CTS (likely Silvio Brusaferro).

• Pippo Anelli: (See Filippo Anelli, likely a casual reference).

Judicial and Law Enforcement Figures:

• NAS (Nuclei Antisofisticazioni e Sanità - Anti-Adulteration and Health Units of the Carabinieri): Law enforcement agency responsible for health and food safety investigations. The NAS of Rome is specifically praised by Balanzoni for its diligence in receiving her reports, even sending officers to her in Alba. The NAS of Genova is involved in transcribing the secret CTS meeting.

• Dottor Stefano Puppo: Public Prosecutor (PM) in Genova, who ordered the transcription of the CTS meeting audio/video.

• Dottoressa Francesca Rombolà: Public Prosecutor (PM) in Genova, co-signed the order for transcription.

• Tenente Colonnello Daniele Quattrocchi: Lieutenant Colonel (initially misidentified as Major) of NAS Genova, responsible for the transcription of the CTS meeting.

• Judge Fabio Cosentino: Penal Judge in Bologna, before whom Filippo Anelli testified.

• Unidentified Magistrates: Balanzoni heavily criticizes and warns magistrates who may have failed to follow up on her denunciations, suggesting possible complicity or cover-ups.

Victims Mentioned:

• Stefano Paternò: A military member who died, his illness allegedly potentiated by an antibody (implied vaccine-related), in Sicily. His death prompted Roberto Speranza to consider withdrawing the vaccine.

• Camilla Cacepa: A person from Genova who died due to issues with the coagulative system, also implicated as an early victim.

• Unnamed Military Personnel: Described as "furious" due to mandatory vaccinations, including for dengue, and recalling being compelled to take COVID-19 vaccines.

Political Figures:

• Giorgia Meloni: Prime Minister of Italy (at the time of the narration). Scheduled to confront Minister Schillaci. Balanzoni criticizes her for being "useless" and traveling abroad while domestic issues unfold.

• Fratelli d'Italia: Political party that requested Giorgio Palù's appearance before the Covid Commission.